Wettling v. Kelly
This text of 50 A. 303 (Wettling v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is conceded that “ the sole question here is whether under the provisions of the several acts of assembly, recited in the history of the case, the appellant was entitled to file and enforce a lien for pumping oil wells on the leasehold estate of the defendants.” It is not necessary for us to enter upon an exhaustive review of the acts of assembly recited in the history referred to, because these appear in the elaborate opinion of Judge Clark to which reference can be readily made. In a careful examination and consideration of that opinion, we are satisfied that a correct conclusion was arrived at by the learned court below. Wo therefore affirm the order of the court and strike off the lien at the costs of the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A. 303, 201 Pa. 12, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wettling-v-kelly-pa-1901.