Wetmore v. Wetmore
This text of 67 P. 98 (Wetmore v. Wetmore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a suit for divorce and to compel a conveyance from the defendant to the plaintiff of certain real estate, which it is alleged was purchased with her money. The complaint was dismissed by the court below, and the plaintiff appeals. An examination of the record satisfies us that the testimony is not sufficient to justify a decree of divorce, and, as the title to real estate cannot be litigated in a proceeding of this kind except as incident thereto [Houston v. Timmerman, 17 Or. 499 (21 Pac. 1037, 4 L. R. A. 716, 11 Am. St. Rep. 848); Uhl v. Uhl, 52 Cal. 250; Peck v. Peck, 66 Mich. 586 (33 N. W. 893)], the decree is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 P. 98, 40 Or. 332, 1902 Ore. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetmore-v-wetmore-or-1902.