Wetmore v. Saunders

219 A.D. 842

This text of 219 A.D. 842 (Wetmore v. Saunders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wetmore v. Saunders, 219 A.D. 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Order changing place of trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Plaintiff brought the action in Suffolk county, where he resides. Defendant, on the ground of convenience of witnesses, moved to change the venue to Cortland county, where he resides and where the cause of action arose. In the circumstances the court had no power, of its own motion, to change the venue to Queens county, where neither party resides. (Levey v. Payne, 200 App. Div. 30.) An analysis of the proof to be offered in this case, read with the concessions made by plaintiff, narrows the issue materially, and requires a denial of the motion to change the place of trial upon the ground of convenience of witnesses. Kelly, P. J., Young, Kapper Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levey v. Payne
200 A.D. 30 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 A.D. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetmore-v-saunders-nyappdiv-1927.