Wetmore v. Dyer

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Wetmore v. Dyer

2 N.J. Eq. 386

DecidedJanuary 15, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J. Eq. 386 (Wetmore v. Dyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wetmore v. Dyer, 2 N.J. Eq. 386 (N.J. Ct. App. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor.

Take the order directing the publication within the state. By the practice of the court it is unnecessary, unless under special circumstances, to advertise the order out of the state, where any of the defendants reside in the state, and are served with process. Foreign publication is only required where all the defendants reside out of the state.

Cited in Oram v. Dennison, 2 Beas. 439.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor.

Take the order directing the publication within the state. By the practice of the court it is unnecessary, unless under special circumstances, to advertise the order out of the state, where any of the defendants reside in the state, and are served with process. Foreign publication is only required where all the defendants reside out of the state.

Cited in Oram v. Dennison, 2 Beas. 439.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.J. Eq. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetmore-v-dyer-njch-1841.