Wetmore v. Dean

103 N.W. 166, 139 Mich. 627, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 985
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 21, 1905·No. Docket No. 107·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Moore, C. J.

The plaintiff obtained judgment in justice’s court against defendant. The case was removed to the circuit court by certiorari, where the judgment was reversed. The case is brought here by writ of error. There were a good many reasons assigned in the affidavit for the writ why the judgment should be set aside. An inspection of the record shows that each of these reasons was fully answered by the return of the justice. This return must be regarded as conclusive. Young v. Kelsey, 46 Mich. 414; Rawson v. McElvaine, 49 Mich. 194; Mann v. Tyler, 56 Mich. 564; People v. Hux, 68 Mich. 477. We think, instead of reversing the judgment of the justice, it should have been affirmed.

Judgment is reversed, and the judgment rendered in justice’s court is affirmed, with costs of both courts.

Carpenter, Grant, Blair, and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wetmore v. Dean, 103 N.W. 166, 139 Mich. 627, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 985 (Mich. 1905).

103 N.W. 166 (Wetmore v. Dean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henika v. Brown
119 N.W. 1083 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)