Wetmore v. Blush
1 Brayt. 55
Opinion
, The Court do not consider themselves at liberty to depart from the numerous precedents in this State ; the law has been long settled by judicial decisions of this Court, that the purchaser of a note not negotiable will not be protected against a payment to the original payee, or a discharge by such payee. A contrary decision would extend the contract beyond the intention of the parties and bind the promis-sor to a fulfilment different from the terms of the contract;
Judgment for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wetmore v. Blush, 1 Brayt. 55 (Vt. 1820).
1 Brayt. 55 (Wetmore v. Blush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.