Wetherill v. Seitzinger

9 Watts & Serg. 177
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 15, 1844
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 9 Watts & Serg. 177 (Wetherill v. Seitzinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wetherill v. Seitzinger, 9 Watts & Serg. 177 (Pa. 1844).

Opinion

Per Curiam

The court are of opinion that under the statutes [180]*180of this Commonwealth in that behalf provided, the court is possessed of jurisdiction of the contract in the petition mentioned, upon the proofs therein mentioned heretofore certified for record in the county of Schuylkill. Whereupon it is ordered, decreed and considered, that the demurrer of Jacob W. Seitzinger be overruled, and that the petitioner, Charlotte W. Wetherill, have leave to execute a conveyance to the said Jacob W. Seitzinger and his heirs, of the lands, tenements and hereditaments in the petition mentioned, according to the prayer therein contained.

Demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mussleman's Appeal
65 Pa. 480 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Watts & Serg. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wetherill-v-seitzinger-pa-1844.