Wetherill v. Seitzinger

9 Watts & Serg. 177
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 15, 1844·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

The court are of opinion that under the statutes [180]*180of this Commonwealth in that behalf provided, the court is possessed of jurisdiction of the contract in the petition mentioned, upon the proofs therein mentioned heretofore certified for record in the county of Schuylkill. Whereupon it is ordered, decreed and considered, that the demurrer of Jacob W. Seitzinger be overruled, and that the petitioner, Charlotte W. Wetherill, have leave to execute a conveyance to the said Jacob W. Seitzinger and his heirs, of the lands, tenements and hereditaments in the petition mentioned, according to the prayer therein contained.

Demurrer overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wetherill v. Seitzinger, 9 Watts & Serg. 177 (Pa. 1844).

9 Watts & Serg. 177 (Wetherill v. Seitzinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mussleman's Appeal
65 Pa. 480 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1870)