Westwood v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission

192 N.W.2d 534, 35 Mich. App. 393, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1474
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided July 29, 1971·No. Docket No. 10339·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the County of [394] Ingham affirming a decision of the Liquor Control Commission denying his application for a Class 0 liquor license. Plaintiff’s application was denied by the commission because plaintiff’s place of business was within 500 feet of a church. MCLA § 436.17a [Stat Ann 1957 Rev § 18.988(1)]. Subsequent to the decision of the commission, § 17a of the Liquor Control Act was amended and the commission now has discretionary power to issue a Class C liquor license to the plaintiff even though plaintiff’s place of business may be within 500 feet of a church. Therefore, it is ordered that the cause be remanded to the Liquor Control Commission for reconsideration in light of MCLA 1971 Cum Supp § 436.17a [Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 18.988(1)] and MCLA 1971 Cum Supp § 436.19c(a) [Stat Ann 1971 Cum Supp § 18.990(3)(a)].

We express no opinion as to the constitutionality of § 17a. We do not retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westwood v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission, 192 N.W.2d 534, 35 Mich. App. 393, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1474 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

192 N.W.2d 534 (Westwood v. Michigan Liquor Control Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related