Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Lane County

866 P.2d 463, 318 Or. 327, 1994 Ore. LEXIS 8
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 3, 1994
DocketCC 16-90-10439; CA A71452; SC S40106
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 866 P.2d 463 (Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Lane County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westwood Homeowners Ass'n v. Lane County, 866 P.2d 463, 318 Or. 327, 1994 Ore. LEXIS 8 (Or. 1994).

Opinion

UNIS, J.

Lane County petitions for reconsideration of this court’s decision in Westwood Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. Lane County, 318 Or 146, 864 P2d 350 (1993). We allow the petition for reconsideration and adhere to our former opinion as modified.

In the statement of facts, our former opinion states:

“In 1990, the Association filed an action in Lane County Circuit Court to foreclose the Association’s lien on the 15 lots for the approximately $18,000 in unpaid assessments that had accumulated between January 1988 and August 1990 after Lane County became record title holder of the 15 lots.” Westwood Homeowners Assn., Inc. v. Lane County, supra, 318 Or at 150.

As our former opinion points out, Lane County acquired title on May 27, 1988. Id. Of the approximately $18,000 in assessments, only a portion was assessed after Lane County acquired title. To be precise, $2,117.88 was assessed between January 28 and May 27, 1988 (i.e., before Lane County acquired title), and $16,131.16 was assessed after May 28, 1988 (i.e., after the county acquired title).

We adhere to our holding that the pre-foreclosure assessments were extinguished by the foreclosure, while the post-foreclosure assessments were not extinguished. The judgment of the trial court awarded the Association the entire $18,249.04.1 Pursuant to our holding, the Association is entitled to ajudgment for $16,131.16. The trial court erred in entering ajudgment for the entire $18,249.04, and the Court of Appeals erred in affirming that judgment.

The petition for reconsideration is allowed. This court’s former opinion is adhered to as modified. The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arellano-Sanchez v. Thrasher
374 Or. 623 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2025)
Western States Land Reliance Trust v. Linn County
343 Or. App. 280 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2025)
Seida, Jr. v. Baldwin
D. Oregon, 2025
State ex rel Rosenblum v. Living Essentials, LLC
497 P.3d 730 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)
Lincoln Loan Co. v. Estate of George Geppert
489 P.3d 1095 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)
Sander v. Nicholson
473 P.3d 1113 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)
State/Klamath County v. Hershey
466 P.3d 987 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2020)
State v. Bordeaux
185 P.3d 524 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)
State v. Rodriguez
175 P.3d 471 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
City v. Dept. of Labor and Industries
965 P.2d 619 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
City of Seattle v. State
965 P.2d 619 (Washington Supreme Court, 1998)
Carlson v. Myers
959 P.2d 31 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1998)
State v. Aguilar
912 P.2d 379 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1996)
Windsor Insurance v. Judd
898 P.2d 761 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1995)
F.N. Realty Services, Inc. v. Oregon Shores Recreational Club, Inc.
891 P.2d 671 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1995)
Marks v. McKenzie High School Fact-Finding Team
878 P.2d 417 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)
Marks v. McKENZIE HS FACT-FINDING TEAM
878 P.2d 417 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 P.2d 463, 318 Or. 327, 1994 Ore. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westwood-homeowners-assn-v-lane-county-or-1994.