Westwood Associates v. Deluxe General, Inc.

420 N.E.2d 966, 53 N.Y.2d 618, 438 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2291
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 24, 1981·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action on grounds of forum non conveniens. That all of the parties to the action may have been New York residents is not dispositive, since the residence of the parties in New York is but one factor to be considered in determining whether an action should be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 327 (see Silver v Great Amer. Ins. Co., 29 NY2d 356; see, generally, Irrigation & Ind. Dev. Corp. v Indag, S. A., 37 NY2d 522).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westwood Associates v. Deluxe General, Inc., 420 N.E.2d 966, 53 N.Y.2d 618, 438 N.Y.S.2d 774, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2291 (N.Y. 1981).

420 N.E.2d 966 (Westwood Associates v. Deluxe General, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nasser v. Nasser
52 A.D.3d 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Rosenberg v. Stikeman Elliott, LLP
44 A.D.3d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Broida v. Bancroft
103 A.D.2d 88 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Brandon v. Chefetz
121 Misc. 2d 54 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Frontier Manufacturing, Inc. v. Comp-Aire Sys., Inc./Joy
94 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Katz v. NVF Co.
119 Misc. 2d 48 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)
Stavredes v. United Skates of America, Inc.
87 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)