Westshore Glass Corporation v. Hack Industries, Inc.

522 So. 2d 1046, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 909, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1384, 1988 WL 30232
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 6, 1988
Docket86-3243
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 522 So. 2d 1046 (Westshore Glass Corporation v. Hack Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westshore Glass Corporation v. Hack Industries, Inc., 522 So. 2d 1046, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 909, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1384, 1988 WL 30232 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

522 So.2d 1046 (1988)

WESTSHORE GLASS CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant,
v.
HACK INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 86-3243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 6, 1988.

*1047 David Hyman, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

There was no sworn evidence — neither affidavits nor testimony — before the trial court upon which it could base an order to transfer venue to Dade County.

The election of venue is initially with the plaintiffs. Assuming the complaint does not affirmatively show that venue is lacking, the burden of pleading and proving improper venue is upon the defendants. The allegations of the unsworn motion to dismiss or to transfer were never established by sworn proof before the trial court. We reverse.

Magee v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 366 So.2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). The Magee case was followed by this court in Davis v. Florida Power Corp., 492 So.2d 829 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). It appears from the affidavit of appellant's president that venue is proper in Hillsborough County. The trial court's order transferring venue to Dade County is reversed and set aside and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in Hillsborough County.

CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BUY AND SELL FITNESS, LLC v. KERVIN VILLALBA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Poliandro v. Springer
899 So. 2d 441 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
McDaniel v. Burton
748 So. 2d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
DEPT. OF LABOR & EMP. SEC. v. Lindquist
698 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Booker v. Booker
636 So. 2d 796 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Breen v. Huntley Jiffy Stores, Inc.
610 So. 2d 29 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Polackwich v. Florida Power & Light Co.
576 So. 2d 892 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 So. 2d 1046, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 909, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1384, 1988 WL 30232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westshore-glass-corporation-v-hack-industries-inc-fladistctapp-1988.