Westrope v. Abbott

133 S.E. 465, 134 S.C. 502, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 67
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided May 12, 1926·No. 11982·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Watts.

This is an appeal from a decree of his Honor, Judge Sease, which will be reported. Both his Honor, Judge Sease, and the Special Referee concurred in their findings of fact and against the contention of the appellants.

Judge Sease, by his decree, practically allowed the respondent to reform the contract; this he had the right to do. Both the Referee and Circuit Judge find that it was a mistake of parties; “was not tainted with usury, and is not serious [usurious?]; that all matters complained *508 of are traceable either to a mistake or error in calculation.” In this finding we agree, and see no error as complained of by the exceptions.

The exceptions are overruled, and judgment affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Cothran, Beease and Stabler and Mr. Acting Associate Justice R. O. Purdy concur. Mr. Chief Justice Gary did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westrope v. Abbott, 133 S.E. 465, 134 S.C. 502, 1926 S.C. LEXIS 67 (S.C. 1926).

133 S.E. 465 (Westrope v. Abbott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.