Westreich v. Westreich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Westreich v. Westreich

2019 NY Slip Op 1257

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 2019

DocketIndex No. 201348/13

StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1257 (Westreich v. Westreich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westreich v. Westreich, 2019 NY Slip Op 1257 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Westreich v Westreich (2019 NY Slip Op 01257)

Westreich v Westreich

2019 NY Slip Op 01257

Decided on February 20, 2019

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 20, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
RUTH C. BALKIN
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2017-02085
(Index No. 201348/13)

[*1]Dale Westreich, respondent,

v

Anthony Westreich, appellant.

Laurence P. Greenberg, New York, NY (Seth Ginsberg and Scarlett Van Syoc of counsel), for appellant.

Cohen Rabin Stine Schumann LLP, New York, NY (Harriet Newman Cohen, Bonnie E. Rabin, Tim James, and Amanda Laird Creegan of counsel), for respondent.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jeffrey A. Goodstein, J.), entered January 4, 2017. The order granted the plaintiff's application for an award of counsel fees to the extent of awarding her the sum of $425,000.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment of divorce in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment of divorce (see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Westreich v Westreich, _____ AD3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2016-10561; decided herewith]).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., BALKIN, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI