Westra v. Westra

165 N.W.2d 490, 14 Mich. App. 358, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 926
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 27, 1968
DocketDocket No. 4,278
StatusPublished

This text of 165 N.W.2d 490 (Westra v. Westra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westra v. Westra, 165 N.W.2d 490, 14 Mich. App. 358, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 926 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff-wife has appealed an order of the trial court continuing the visitation rights of appellee-father with his minor children.

Plaintiff contested defendant’s petition to show cause for her refusing visitation rights by claiming that defendant’s visitation rights should be rescinded because of his association with male persons of immoral character.

Plaintiff failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant associated with men [359]*359of immoral character or other improper conduct. Claimed proof which is only the result of rumors, hearsay, or innuendo is not sufficient. Furthermore, plaintiff presented no evidence of ill effects to the children.

The trial court’s order amends the divorce decree restricting the visitation rights of defendant in such a manner that there will be no opportunity for exposure of the children to any immoral activity. Should there be need for further relief, either parent can petition the court.

Affirmed.

Holbrook, P. J., and T. G. Kavanagh and McIntyre, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
165 N.W.2d 490, 14 Mich. App. 358, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westra-v-westra-michctapp-1968.