Home/California Court of Appeal/Westphal v. Superior Court

Westphal v. Superior Court

120 Cal. App. 263
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 28, 1932
DocketCiv. No. 8354
StatusPublished

This text of 120 Cal. App. 263 (Westphal v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westphal v. Superior Court, 120 Cal. App. 263 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

THE COURT.

Application for writ of prohibition to prevent a receiver appointed by respondent court from further interfering with the property of petitioner.

It is claimed the appointment was void for the reason that there was a noncompliance with the provisions of section 566 of the Code of Civil Procedure with reference to the bond required by that section. Under authority of Ryan v. Murphy, 39 Cal. App. 640 [179 Pac. 517], Van Alen v. Superior Court, 37 Cal. App. 696 [174 Pac. 672], Bibby v. Dieter, 15 Cal. App. 45 [113 Pac. 874], and Davila v. Heath, 13 Cal. App. 370 [109 Pac. 893], the writ is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davila v. Heath
109 P. 893 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Bibby v. Dieter
113 P. 874 (California Court of Appeal, 1910)
Ryan v. Murphy
179 P. 517 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Van Alen v. Superior Court
174 P. 672 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 Cal. App. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westphal-v-superior-court-calctapp-1932.