Westphal v. Morrow

531 So. 2d 731, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2068, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3863, 1988 WL 89143
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 31, 1988
DocketNo. 4-86-2975
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 531 So. 2d 731 (Westphal v. Morrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westphal v. Morrow, 531 So. 2d 731, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2068, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3863, 1988 WL 89143 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand for a new trial on all issues. Specifically, we believe it was error for the trial court to enter summary judgment in advance of trial on the appellant’s claim for rescission. See Durbin Paper Stock Co. v. Watson-David Insurance Co., 167 So.2d 34 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); Erwin v. Scholfield, 416 So.2d 478 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Wolfe v. Aetna Insurance Co., 436 So.2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983).

We decline to rule on the other issues raised on appeal because we consider them moot in light of our reversal on the summary judgment issue and direction that there be a new trial.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westphal v. Morrow
536 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Brown v. Powell
531 So. 2d 731 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 So. 2d 731, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2068, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3863, 1988 WL 89143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westphal-v-morrow-fladistctapp-1988.