Westphal v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

32 A.D.3d 429, 820 N.Y.S.2d 613
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 8, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), [430] dated June 15, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and denied, as academic, their cross motion for an open commission to take a nonparty deposition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The evidence submitted by the plaintiff established a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of the defendants’ liability (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 325 [1986]). Any minor inconsistencies in the testimony of the plaintiff’s witnesses were insufficient in this case to raise a bona fide issue as to their credibility (see Coughlin v Bartnick, 293 AD2d 509 [2002]).

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westphal v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., 32 A.D.3d 429, 820 N.Y.S.2d 613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

32 A.D.3d 429 (Westphal v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.
83 A.D.3d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)