Weston v. Stoddard

16 N.Y.S. 605, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 76, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2130
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Weston v. Stoddard. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 N.Y.S. 580
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 8, 1891·Published

Opinion

Learned, P. J.

The action of partition has long been an equitable remedy. 1 Story, Eq. Jur. § 646, and subsequent sections. There was also a special proceeding provided for by the Revised Statutes, which might be taken in courts of law. But that left, in express language, the jurisdiction of the court of chancery unaffected. Such an action is not within section 968 or section 3228. It is governed by section 3230, and costs are in the discretion of the court. An issue of fact in the action is triable by a jury. Section 1544. But that does not determine that the action is so triable, or bring the action within section 3228, subd. I.1 The right to award costs to plaintiff and to defendant was recognized in Henderson v. Scott, 43 Hun, 22, and this must overcome the special term decision of Davis v. Davis, 3 N. Y. St. Rep. 163. We think, therefore, that the matter was in the discretion of the. special term, and there is no question that the discretion was not properly exercised. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and printing disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Weston v. Stoddard, 16 N.Y.S. 605, 42 N.Y. St. Rep. 76, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2130 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

16 N.Y.S. 605 (Weston v. Stoddard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.