Weston v. Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Weston v. Manchester

62 N.H. 574

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1883·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The plaintiff is entitled to an abatement. Gf. L., c. 53, s. 6.; People v. Weaver, 100 U. S. 539; Supervisors v. Startsley, 105 U. S. 305; Hills v. Exchange Bank, 105 U. S. 319; Evansville Bank v. Britton, 105 U. S. 322; Cool. Tax. 389.

Case discharged.

Stanley, Smith, and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

The plaintiff is entitled to an abatement. Gf. L., c. 53, s. 6.; People v. Weaver, 100 U. S. 539; Supervisors v. Startsley, 105 U. S. 305; Hills v. Exchange Bank, 105 U. S. 319; Evansville Bank v. Britton, 105 U. S. 322; Cool. Tax. 389.

Case discharged.

Stanley, Smith, and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Weston v. Manchester, 62 N.H. 574 (N.H. 1883).

Pincite

62 N.H. 574 (Weston v. Manchester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related