Weston v. Hudson

97 A. 743, 78 N.H. 588, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 71
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedApril 4, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 97 A. 743 (Weston v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weston v. Hudson, 97 A. 743, 78 N.H. 588, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 71 (N.H. 1916).

Opinion

Parsons, C. J.

If the plaintiffs as members of a bridge committee can be considered public officers they can recover only the salary incident to the office. If, however, they are to be considered agents or employees of the town they can recover only such compensation as the town has expressly or by implication agreed to pay. Both propositions are questions of fact. In the absence of a finding or agreement favorable to the plaintiffs upon one of these propositions, no liability is shown, and it is unnecessary to determine whether the plaintiffs were public officers or mere employees of the town.

Judgment for the defendant.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A. 743, 78 N.H. 588, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weston-v-hudson-nh-1916.