Weston v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.

6 Cal. 425
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 425 (Weston v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Weston v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co., 6 Cal. 425 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Murray.

Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt concurred.

A party who purchases at sheriff's sale, stocks of an incorporation, knowing that the certificates of such stock have been previously hypothecated, is chargeable with notice of such fact, and takes subject to the claim of the pledgee. Neither the incorporation law of 1850, or of 1853, was intended to cover a' case of this kind, but apply only to transfers and purchases in good faith without notice.

In the case of Weston v. The Bear River Water and Mining Company, decided at the April term, 1855, this point was not presented to the consideration of the Court, and the case went off on a construction of the statute only.

In the present case, the fact is found by the Court below, and upon that finding it results that the plaintiff, who knew of the hypothecation of the certificates, is not a purchaser in good faith, and therefore not entitled to relief in a Court of equity.

The statute of 1853 does not substantially alter the law of 1850, and as the construction established in the former decision, is now generally understood, and acted upon, public policy demands that it should be maintained.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anglo-California Trust Co. v. Holbrook
24 P.2d 169 (California Supreme Court, 1933)
Richman v. Bank of Perris
282 P. 801 (California Court of Appeal, 1929)
Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.
292 P. 55 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Nat. Bank Etc. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.
108 P. 676 (California Supreme Court, 1910)
Brissell v. Knapp
155 F. 809 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1907)
Mapleton Bank v. Standrod
67 L.R.A. 656 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1902)
West Coast Safety Faucet Co. v. Wulff
65 P. 622 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
Spreckels v. Nevada Bank
45 P. 329 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Winter v. Belmont Mining Co.
53 Cal. 428 (California Supreme Court, 1879)
Parrott v. Byers
40 Cal. 614 (California Supreme Court, 1871)
People ex rel. Mead v. Elmore
35 Cal. 653 (California Supreme Court, 1868)
Naglee v. Pacific Wharf Co.
20 Cal. 529 (California Supreme Court, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/weston-v-bear-river-auburn-water-mining-co-cal-1856.