Westmoreland v. Gainesville & Northwestern Railway Co.
Opinion
1. Where A and B enter into a contract which contains no stipulation as to the time of its performance, and A (the party who agrees to perform) fails to perform within a reasonable time, performance within such time is waived by B if after such failure he urges A to perform and A thereupon does perform, and the performance is accepted as satisfactory by B. Jordan v. Rhodes, 24 Ga. 478; Moody v. Griffin, 60 Ga. 460; Greene County Oil Go. v. MeOaw Mfg. Go., 9 Ga. App. 39 (70 S. E. 201), and authorities cited; Hollister v. Bluthenlhal, 9 Ga. App. 176 (8) -(70 S. E. 970).
(a) This ruling is not in conflict with the decision in Bernhardt v. Federal Terra Gotta Go., 24 Ga. App. 635 (101 S. E. 588), for the facts of that ease were quite different from those in the instant one.
2. Under the above ruling and the facts of this ease, the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
107 S.E. 891 (Westmoreland v. Gainesville & Northwestern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.