Westmoreland v. Bosworth

Missouri Court of Appeals

Westmoreland v. Bosworth

556 S.W.3d 124

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 4, 2018·No. No. ED 106243·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*125Christopher Westmoreland, et al. appeal the trial court's dismissal with prejudice of their petition alleging that in a prior collections action, Respondents engaged in self-dealing, misappropriated Appellants' funds, or were negligent.

We find that no error of law appears, and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. Therefore, we affirm and dispose of this case by written order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*125Christopher Westmoreland, et al. appeal the trial court's dismissal with prejudice of their petition alleging that in a prior collections action, Respondents engaged in self-dealing, misappropriated Appellants' funds, or were negligent.

We find that no error of law appears, and that an extended opinion would have no precedential value. Therefore, we affirm and dispose of this case by written order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Westmoreland v. Bosworth, 556 S.W.3d 124 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

556 S.W.3d 124 (Westmoreland v. Bosworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.