Westlund v. State

571 So. 2d 111, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9590, 1990 WL 205492
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Westlund v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 570 So. 2d 1133
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1990·No. No. 89-2120·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Frederick Westlund appeals his convictions for trafficking in cocaine, conspiracy to traffic in cocaine and delivery of cocaine. Appellant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an adequate Richardson hearing when it discovered that a taped interview of a codefend-ant had not been released to defense counsel. We reverse.

The record reveals that the trial court recognized the discovery violation, but failed to conduct an inquiry pursuant to Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). The failure to conduct such an inquiry constitutes per se reversible error. See Smith v. State, 500 So.2d 125 (Fla.1986). We find no merit in appellant’s other points on appeal.

Accordingly, we reverse appellant’s convictions and remand for a new trial consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westlund v. State, 571 So. 2d 111, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9590, 1990 WL 205492 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

571 So. 2d 111 (Westlund v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
500 So. 2d 125 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Richardson v. State
246 So. 2d 771 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)