Westling v. United States

288 U.S. 590, 53 S. Ct. 400
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 20, 1933
DocketNo. 583
StatusPublished

This text of 288 U.S. 590 (Westling v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westling v. United States, 288 U.S. 590, 53 S. Ct. 400 (1933).

Opinion

[590]*590Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Mr. Henry C. Carlson for appellant. No appearance for the United States.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, it appearing that the Circuit Court of Appeals, in determining this case, did not decide against the validity of a statute of a State upon the ground of its being repugnant to the constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States. Section 240 (b) Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 939). Public Service Commission v. Batesville Telephone Co., 284 U. S. 6; Baxter v. Continental Casualty Co., 284 U. S. 578; Bradford Electric Light Co. v. Clapper, 284 U. S. 221, 224, 225.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bradford Electric Light Co. v. Clapper
284 U.S. 221 (Supreme Court, 1931)
Baxter v. Continental Casualty Co.
284 U.S. 578 (Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 U.S. 590, 53 S. Ct. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westling-v-united-states-scotus-1933.