Westley v. Hub Cycles, Inc.

681 So. 2d 719, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3904, 1996 WL 187159
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1996
DocketNo. 94-02393
StatusPublished

This text of 681 So. 2d 719 (Westley v. Hub Cycles, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westley v. Hub Cycles, Inc., 681 So. 2d 719, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3904, 1996 WL 187159 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Earnest P. Westley appeals the final judgment entered in favor of Hub Cycles, Inc., in this personal injury action. Westley suffered substantial injuries in a motorcycle accident. Through this lawsuit he has attempted to place responsibility for the accident with the dealership that sold him the motorcycle. Unfortunately, Westley’s injuries left him unable to assist in establishing the facts leading to the accident and, therefore, unable to assist in establishing whether there was negligence on the part of Hub Cycles. Without any direct testimony as to the true cause of the accident, Westley attempted to establish negligence through expert testimony. The trial court properly excluded the expert’s opinion as to Westley’s main theory of liability, the position of the fuel petcoek when the motorcycle left the dealership, because there was no factual foundation in support thereof. See Lang Pools v. McIntosh, 415 So.2d 842 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Further, the trial court properly granted Hub Cycles’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because Westley’s secondary theory of liability did not create a jury issue concerning the breach of any duty resulting in injury to Westley.

We reverse the order imposing sanctions against Westley’s counsel because there is insufficient evidence to show that counsel intentionally failed to timely comply with the discovery request. The record does not sufficiently establish that counsel had the relevant document, or was dilatory in obtaining it, to warrant the imposition of sanctions.

Accordingly, we vacate the order imposing sanctions. In all other respects, we affirm.

FRANK, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lang Pools v. McIntosh
415 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
681 So. 2d 719, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3904, 1996 WL 187159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westley-v-hub-cycles-inc-fladistctapp-1996.