Westlake Land Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Westlake Land Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

1999 Ohio 339, 86 Ohio St. 3d 34

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 30, 1999

Docket1998-2476

StatusPublished

This text of 1999 Ohio 339 (Westlake Land Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westlake Land Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1999 Ohio 339, 86 Ohio St. 3d 34 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 34.]

WESTLAKE LAND CO., APPELLEE, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEE; WESTLAKE BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT.

[Cite as Westlake Land Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1999-Ohio-339.] Taxation—Real property valuation—Court of appeals’ decision affirmed on authority of Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision. (No. 98-2476—Submitted May 26, 1999—Decided June 30, 1999.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 98-A-482. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is now before the court upon an appeal as of right. __________________ Ulmer & Berne, L.L.P., and Bill J. Gagliano, for appellant. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 2} We affirm this decision on the authority of Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 156, 707 N.E.2d 499. Decision affirmed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 3} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my concurrence in part and dissent in part in Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 156, 161, 707 N.E.2d 499, 503. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 86 Ohio St.3d 34.]

WESTLAKE LAND CO., APPELLEE, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEE; WESTLAKE BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT.

[Cite as Westlake Land Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 1999-Ohio-339.] Taxation—Real property valuation—Court of appeals’ decision affirmed on authority of Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision. (No. 98-2476—Submitted May 26, 1999—Decided June 30, 1999.) APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 98-A-482. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause is now before the court upon an appeal as of right. __________________ Ulmer & Berne, L.L.P., and Bill J. Gagliano, for appellant. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 2} We affirm this decision on the authority of Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 156, 707 N.E.2d 499. Decision affirmed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissents. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 3} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my concurrence in part and dissent in part in Worthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 156, 161, 707 N.E.2d 499, 503. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Ohio 339, 86 Ohio St. 3d 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westlake-land-co-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-revision-ohio-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack