Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Syracuse Auto Supply Corp.

233 A.D. 788
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to plead over within twenty days upon payment of the costs of the motion and of this appeal, on the ground that the oral agreement relied on by the answer is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds, being an executory agreement not to be performed within one year. We are required to pass upon this question as of the date of the beginning of the action, although the matter would not be material in a new action, as the date of ultimate extension, January 1,1931, has already passed. (Burns v. Lopez, 256 N. Y. 123; Delaware Trust Co. v. Calm, 195 id. 231.) All concur, except Crouch and Thompson, JJ., who dissent and vote for affirmance in a memorandum. Present—Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Syracuse Auto Supply Corp., 233 A.D. 788 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

233 A.D. 788 (Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Syracuse Auto Supply Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of New York v. Sasson
786 F. Supp. 349 (S.D. New York, 1992)