Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Circle Painting Co.
This text of 244 A.D. 766 (Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Circle Painting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the absence of any showing of facts by the respondents that the sum of $4,293.80 remains unpaid under the contract with the city, the affidavits interposed by the city alleging that only $2,938.30 remains unpaid sufficiently raise an issue of fact in respect to the excess claimed to be due. The plaintiff and the defendant G. & G. Electric Supply Co., Inc., having consented to waive the excess of their aggregate claims, amounting to $2,992.54, over the amount concededly in the city's hands, the order appealed from should be modified to that extent, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Since there is an issue of fact as to whether there is any excess applicable to the claim of the defendant Sterling National Bank and Trust Company of New York, the order in its favor should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and its cross-motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Present ■— Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
So much of the order as grants the cross-motion of defendant Sterling National Bank and Trust Company of New York is reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and said cross-motion denied, with ten dollars costs. In other respects the order is modified to the extent indicated in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 A.D. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westinghouse-electric-supply-co-v-circle-painting-co-nyappdiv-1935.