Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper
222 F. 1023, 137 C.C.A. 430, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527
Opinion
Agreeing with Judge Orr that the first claim of the Bormann patent is valid and has been infringed by the appellant, we see no need to add anything to his opinion reported in 212 Fed. at page 184. The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper, 222 F. 1023, 137 C.C.A. 430, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527 (3d Cir. 1915).
222 F. 1023 (Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.