Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper
222 F. 1023, 137 C.C.A. 430, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527
This text of 222 F. 1023 (Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper, 222 F. 1023, 137 C.C.A. 430, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527 (3d Cir. 1915).
Opinion
Agreeing with Judge Orr that the first claim of the Bormann patent is valid and has been infringed by the appellant, we see no need to add anything to his opinion reported in 212 Fed. at page 184. The decree is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
222 F. 1023, 137 C.C.A. 430, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westinghouse-electric-mfg-co-v-kupper-ca3-1915.