Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper

222 F. 1023, 137 C.C.A. 430, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 29, 1915·No. No. 1898·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Agreeing with Judge Orr that the first claim of the Bormann patent is valid and has been infringed by the appellant, we see no need to add anything to his opinion reported in 212 Fed. at page 184. The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper, 222 F. 1023, 137 C.C.A. 430, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1527 (3d Cir. 1915).

222 F. 1023 (Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Kupper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.