Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. City of Burlington

326 F.2d 691, 117 U.S. App. D.C. 148
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 2, 1964·No. Nos. 17747, 17931-17933·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

The issue urged1 by appellants has already been litigated unsuccessfully in related suits before the Courts of Appeals for the Second,2 Seventh,3 Eighth,4 and Tenth 5 Circuits. Petitions for certiorari were denied three times by the Supreme Court.6 The matter is under submission in the Fifth7 and Ninth8 Circuits. The Third Circuit has denied leave to take an interlocutory appeal.9 Under the circumstances, we wonder whether the issue can really be said to be still open for adjudication. If it is, we would adopt the reasons stated10 by Chief Judge Lumbard for the Second Circuit, en banc, and affirm, the order of the District Court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. City of Burlington, 326 F.2d 691, 117 U.S. App. D.C. 148 (D.C. Cir. 1964).

326 F.2d 691 (Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. City of Burlington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related