Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. City of Burlington
This text of 326 F.2d 691 (Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. City of Burlington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The issue urged1 by appellants has already been litigated unsuccessfully in related suits before the Courts of Appeals for the Second,2 Seventh,3 Eighth,4 and Tenth 5 Circuits. Petitions for certiorari were denied three times by the Supreme Court.6 The matter is under submission in the Fifth7 and Ninth8 Circuits. The Third Circuit has denied leave to take an interlocutory appeal.9 Under the circumstances, we wonder whether the issue can really be said to be still open for adjudication. If it is, we would adopt the reasons stated10 by Chief Judge Lumbard for the Second Circuit, en banc, and affirm, the order of the District Court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
326 F.2d 691, 117 U.S. App. D.C. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westinghouse-electric-corp-v-city-of-burlington-cadc-1964.