Home/Supreme Court/Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United States

Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United States

364 U.S. 518, 81 S. Ct. 293, 5 L. Ed. 2d 264, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1973, 1960 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,874
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 19, 1960·No. 484·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the opinion that the motion to affirm should be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 364 U.S. 518, 81 S. Ct. 293, 5 L. Ed. 2d 264, 1960 U.S. LEXIS 1973, 1960 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,874 (1960).

364 U.S. 518 (Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sigety v. Abrams
492 F. Supp. 1123 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Smith v. Lewis
578 S.W.2d 169 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)
Brittian v. General Telephone Co. of Southwest
533 S.W.2d 886 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1976)
Steele v. State
537 P.2d 782 (Washington Supreme Court, 1975)
Texas Woman's University v. Chayklintaste
521 S.W.2d 949 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1975)
4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 353, 4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 543, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7679, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7864 Mary Ellen Schattman v. Texas Employment Commission
459 F.2d 32 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Eslinger v. Thomas
340 F. Supp. 886 (D. South Carolina, 1972)
Schattman v. Texas Employment Commission
459 F.2d 32 (Fifth Circuit, 1972)
Holiday Inns of America v. Industrial Commission
271 N.E.2d 884 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1971)
State v. Rys
183 N.W.2d 253 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1971)
Williams v. McNair
316 F. Supp. 134 (D. South Carolina, 1970)
Kirstein v. Rector and Visitors of University of Virginia
309 F. Supp. 184 (E.D. Virginia, 1970)
Passel v. Fort Worth Independent School District
429 S.W.2d 917 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1968)
United States v. Blue Chip Stamp Company
272 F. Supp. 432 (C.D. California, 1967)
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
386 U.S. 129 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
41 F.R.D. 342 (E.D. Missouri, 1967)
Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation
245 F. Supp. 258 (M.D. Pennsylvania, 1965)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1965