Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.
This text of 84 F. 9 (Westinghouse Air-Brake Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an equity suit for the infringement of a patent. The pleas dispute the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that neither of the defendants served with process within this district was at the time of such service a citizen of this state or an inhabitant of this district. The question thus presented, which has been variously decided by the circuit courts, must now be determined in favor of the complainant, so far at least, as this court is> concerned, upon the authority of Southern Pac. Co. v. Earl, 82 Fed. 690, 694, affirming Earl v. Southern Pac. Co., 75 Fed. 609. The pleas are overruled, the defendants to answer within 20 days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. 9, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 2907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westinghouse-air-brake-co-v-great-northern-ry-co-circtsdny-1897.