Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co.

118 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5249

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedOctober 18, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 118 F. 1023 (Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westinghouse Air Brake Co. v. Christensen Engineering Co., 118 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5249 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant may have 10 days from to-day in which to examine not more than two witnesses to testify that the two valves made by complainants and subjected to experiment are not made in accordance with the Holleman patent. In all other respects the motion is denied. The taking of this surrebuttal testimony shall not operate to change the position of the cause on the equity calendar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant may have 10 days from to-day in which to examine not more than two witnesses to testify that the two valves made by complainants and subjected to experiment are not made in accordance with the Holleman patent. In all other respects the motion is denied. The taking of this surrebuttal testimony shall not operate to change the position of the cause on the equity calendar.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westinghouse-air-brake-co-v-christensen-engineering-co-circtsdny-1902.