Westfield v. Mayor of Toccoa

6 S.E. 471, 80 Ga. 735
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 7, 1888·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

In this case, it does not appear that the bill of exceptions was served upon the opposite party, except by a mere statement in writing by counsel for the plaintiff in error, endorsed on the bill of exceptions, as follows : “ 1 have this day served Ed. Schaefer, mayor of Toccoa City.” [736]*736There is no affidavit that the bill of exceptions was served. There was no appearance here for the defendant. It has been repeatedly ruled by this court that a mere statement of this character is not sufficient to show service ; so we are constrained to dismiss the writ of error.

Writ of error dismissed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westfield v. Mayor of Toccoa, 6 S.E. 471, 80 Ga. 735 (Ga. 1888).

6 S.E. 471 (Westfield v. Mayor of Toccoa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ivey v. McWilliams
174 S.E. 354 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)
Smith v. McKnight Bros.
113 S.E. 48 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Anderson v. Humphries
78 S.E. 1079 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Advance Lumber Co. v. Moreland
132 Ga. 852 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)