Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman
131 A. 924, 99 N.J. Eq. 435, 14 Stock. 435, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 538
Opinion
The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Eielder.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Teenchabd, Mintuen, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, .Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman, 131 A. 924, 99 N.J. Eq. 435, 14 Stock. 435, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 538 (N.J. 1926).
131 A. 924 (Westfield Trust Co. v. Beekman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Robert
171 A.2d 348 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Skovborg v. Smith
72 A.2d 911 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Duane v. Stevens
44 A.2d 716 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Harloff
30 A.2d 57 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)
Murphy v. Westfield Trust Co.
20 A.2d 359 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1941)
Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.
9 A.2d 311 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Rowe v. Rowe
167 A. 16 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
National Newark v. Arthur, C., Blind Babies
166 A. 635 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)