Westfield Ins. v. Hunter
This text of 922 N.E.2d 226 (Westfield Ins. v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Butler App. Nos. CA2009-05-134 and CA2009-06-157, 2009-Ohio-5642. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed December 8, 2009:
“When construing an insurance policy exclusion, does an injury ’arise out’ of a premises only if some dangerous condition exists on the premises that caused or contributed to the injury, or must the injury only originate in or have a causal connection with the premises?”
The conflict case is Am. States Ins. Co. v. Guillermin (1995), 108 Ohio App.3d 547, 671 N.E.2d 317.
Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2009-2214, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Hunter, Butler App. Nos. CA2009-05-134 and CA2009-06-157, 2009-Ohio-5642.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
922 N.E.2d 226, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westfield-ins-v-hunter-ohio-2010.