Westfield Ins. v. Hunter

922 N.E.2d 226, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1490
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 2010·No. 2010-0024·Published

Opinion

Butler App. Nos. CA2009-05-134 and CA2009-06-157, 2009-Ohio-5642. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed December 8, 2009:

“When construing an insurance policy exclusion, does an injury ’arise out’ of a premises only if some dangerous condition exists on the premises that caused or contributed to the injury, or must the injury only originate in or have a causal connection with the premises?”

The conflict case is Am. States Ins. Co. v. Guillermin (1995), 108 Ohio App.3d 547, 671 N.E.2d 317.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2009-2214, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Hunter, Butler App. Nos. CA2009-05-134 and CA2009-06-157, 2009-Ohio-5642.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westfield Ins. v. Hunter, 922 N.E.2d 226, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1490 (Ohio 2010).

922 N.E.2d 226 (Westfield Ins. v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American States Insurance v. Guillermin
671 N.E.2d 317 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1996)