Westfall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Westfall v. State

534 So. 2d 931, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5850, 1988 WL 133904

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1988

DocketNo. 88-3194

StatusPublished

This text of 534 So. 2d 931 (Westfall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westfall v. State, 534 So. 2d 931, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5850, 1988 WL 133904 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, but remand for correction of appellant’s written sentences to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement that it would recommend that appellant serve his sentences in a youthful offender facility within the Department of Corrections or through its youthful offender program.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, but remand for correction of appellant’s written sentences to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement that it would recommend that appellant serve his sentences in a youthful offender facility within the Department of Corrections or through its youthful offender program.

AFFIRMED.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 So. 2d 931, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5850, 1988 WL 133904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westfall-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.