Western Union Telegraph Co. v. White & Co.

129 Ala. 188
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1900·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

DOWDELL, J.

The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and a judgment was-entered in favor of the plaintiff. The bill of exceptions sets out the evidence introduced upon the trial, but fails to show that any exception was taken and reserved to the judgment rendered. There was no request for a special finding on the facts and no such finding was had. Code of 1896, §§ 3319-21. In such case the judgment of the court takes the place of the verdict of the jury, .and is not subject to review on appeal.—Chandler v. Crossland, 126 Ala. 176; Quillman v. Gurley, 85 Ala. 594; Betancourt v. Eberlin, 71 Ala. 466.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. White & Co., 129 Ala. 188 (Ala. 1900).

129 Ala. 188 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. White & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wiggins v. Wiggins
2 So. 2d 402 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1941)
Johnson v. Barnett
199 So. 804 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1941)
Johnstone v. O'Rear
124 So. 743 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
McDonough v. Commercial State Bank
73 So. 754 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Cefalu v. Dearborn & Warfield
49 So. 1030 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1909)
First Bank v. Mayfield Woolen Mills
40 So. 954 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)
Crew v. Heard
40 So. 337 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)