Home/New York Court of Appeals/Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Selly

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Selly

68 N.E.2d 183, 295 N.Y. 395
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 1946·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The removal of the arbitrator was within the discretion of the Special Term. The exercise of that discretion was approved by the Appellate Division and we are required to presume that all questions of fact were there determined in favor of the respondent (Civ. Prac. Act, § 603). We are not able to say that the courts below abused their discretion.

Our conclusion is that the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the third question certified answered in the affirmative, it being unnecessary to answer the other questions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Selly, 68 N.E.2d 183, 295 N.Y. 395 (N.Y. 1946).

68 N.E.2d 183 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Selly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mobil Oil Indonesia Inc. v. Asamera Oil (Indonesia) Ltd.
56 A.D.2d 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
In Re Arbitration Between Astoria Medical Group & Health Insurance Plan
182 N.E.2d 85 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)
In re the Arbitration between Astoria Medical Group & Health Insurance Plan
13 A.D.2d 288 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
In re the Arbitration between Ballantine Books, Inc. & Capital Distributing Co.
11 A.D.2d 933 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.
160 N.E.2d 78 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
Diamond v. latzer
17 Misc. 2d 963 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
In re the Arbitration between Linwood & Sherry
10 Misc. 2d 170 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
In re the Arbitration between De Nicola & Polcini
2 Misc. 2d 665 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
In Re the Arbitration Between Lipschutz & Gutwirth
106 N.E.2d 8 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)