Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Selly
This text of 68 N.E.2d 183 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Selly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The removal of the arbitrator was within the discretion of the Special Term. The exercise of that discretion was approved by the Appellate Division and we are required to presume that all questions of fact were there determined in favor of the respondent (Civ. Prac. Act, § 603). We are not able to say that the courts below abused their discretion.
Our conclusion is that the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the third question certified answered in the affirmative, it being unnecessary to answer the other questions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 N.E.2d 183, 295 N.Y. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-union-telegraph-co-v-selly-ny-1946.