Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.

Fifth Circuit

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.

250 F. 207, 162 C.C.A. 343, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1873

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 1918

DocketNo. 3138

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 250 F. 207 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry., 250 F. 207, 162 C.C.A. 343, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1873 (5th Cir. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

There are differences between this case and the ease of Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 230 Fed. 199, — C. C. A. -, Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, present term; but the similarities between the two cases are such as to make the opinion rendered in the last-mentioned case a sufficient disclosure of the grounds relied on to support the conclusion reached in this case that it was not reversible error to dismiss the plaintiff’s (appellant’s) bill of complaint as it was amended.

The decree to that effect is affirmed.

BATTS, Circuit Judge, not participating in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

There are differences between this case and the ease of Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 230 Fed. 199, — C. C. A. -, Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, present term; but the similarities between the two cases are such as to make the opinion rendered in the last-mentioned case a sufficient disclosure of the grounds relied on to support the conclusion reached in this case that it was not reversible error to dismiss the plaintiff’s (appellant’s) bill of complaint as it was amended.

The decree to that effect is affirmed.

BATTS, Circuit Judge, not participating in the decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 F. 207, 162 C.C.A. 343, 1918 U.S. App. LEXIS 1873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-union-telegraph-co-v-nashville-c-st-l-ry-ca5-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack