Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McHenry

3 Willson 27
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 31, 1885
DocketNo. 3563
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Willson 27 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McHenry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. McHenry, 3 Willson 27 (Tex. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

[28]*28October 31, 1885.

§ 9. Exceptions to pleading and evidence, not presented in trial court, will not be considered on appeal; errors cured by verdict; case stated. McHenry sued the telegraph company to recover $500 damages for failure to transmit and deliver a message. Defendant filed a general demurrer and special exceptions, and a special answer. On the trial, the demurrer and exceptions were not called to the attention of the court, and the court made no ruling thereon. No objection was made by the defendant to any evidence adduced. There was a verdict for plaintiff for $500, and judgment accordingly. All the errors assigned relate to the sufficiency of the petition and the admissibility of evidence. It is too late for appellant to complain of such errors for the first time in this court. As to the petition, the verdict cures all defects, imperfections or omissions, or statement of the cause of action, whether of substance or of form, if the issues joined be such as require proof of the facts imperfectly stated, which is the case here. [De Witt v. Miller, 9 Tex. 239; McClellan v. State, 22 Tex. 405; Carter v. Wallace, 2 Tex. 206; Murphy v. Stell, 43 Tex. 123.] In this case, the petition was, perhaps, defective in allegations which would entitle the plaintiff to recover the special damages claimed, and evidence of such damage was not, perhaps, admissible under the allegations. But appellant, having waived exceptions to the petition, and having failed to object to the evidence in proof of special damage, cannot be heard to insist upon such exceptions and objections for the first time on appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carter v. Wallace
2 Tex. 206 (Texas Supreme Court, 1847)
De Witt v. Miller's Adm'r
9 Tex. 239 (Texas Supreme Court, 1852)
McClellan v. State
22 Tex. 405 (Texas Supreme Court, 1858)
Murphy v. Stell
43 Tex. 123 (Texas Supreme Court, 1875)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Willson 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-union-telegraph-co-v-mchenry-texapp-1885.