Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

248 U.S. 532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 U.S. 649
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 4, 1918·No. No. 524·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) a. § 128 of the Judicial Code; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300; b. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600. (2) Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 96 U. S. 1; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor [533]*533R. R. Co., 178 U. S. 239; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 195 U. S. 540; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Richmond, 224 U. S. 160; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 237 U. S. 300. See Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co., 244 U. S. 649.

Mr. William L. Clay and Mr. Rush Taggart for appellant. Mr. Henry L. Stone and Mr. Henry C. Peeples for appellee.

See post, 576.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad, 248 U.S. 532 (1918).

248 U.S. 532 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related