Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Goodsey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Goodsey

4 Willson 184

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 4, 1890

DocketNo. 6533

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Willson 184 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Goodsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Goodsey, 4 Willson 184 (Tex. Ct. App. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 123. Pleading; exemplary damages; facts entitling party must he alleged. This is a suit by appellee against the appellant to recover damages, both actual and exemplary, for failure to transmit and deliver a telegram sent by him from Eosenberg to Cleburne, Texas. He recovered judgment for $10 actual and $50 exemplary damages and for costs. In his original petition appellee [185]*185made no claim for exemplary damages, but in a trial amendment he made such claim, based upon a general allegation of gross negligence on the part of appellant’s servants and employees. Appellant excepted to the sufficiency of the trial amendment, which exception the court overruled, and submitted to the jury the issue of exemplary damages. We are of opinion that exception to the claim of exemplary damages should have been sustained. No facts are alleged in the trial amendment which under the law would entitle appellee to recover exemplary damages. [Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 58 Tex. 170; Hays v. Railway Co., 46 Tex. 272; Daniel v. Telegraph Co., 61 Tex. 456.] We are not prepared to say that the claim for actual damages for anxiety of mind is not maintainable. We incline to the opinion that it is, and therefore hold that the court did not err in overruling the exceptions to the original petition. Because the court erred in not sustaining the exceptions to the claim for exemplary damages, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

June 4, 1890.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 123. Pleading; exemplary damages; facts entitling party must he alleged. This is a suit by appellee against the appellant to recover damages, both actual and exemplary, for failure to transmit and deliver a telegram sent by him from Eosenberg to Cleburne, Texas. He recovered judgment for $10 actual and $50 exemplary damages and for costs. In his original petition appellee [185]*185made no claim for exemplary damages, but in a trial amendment he made such claim, based upon a general allegation of gross negligence on the part of appellant’s servants and employees. Appellant excepted to the sufficiency of the trial amendment, which exception the court overruled, and submitted to the jury the issue of exemplary damages. We are of opinion that exception to the claim of exemplary damages should have been sustained. No facts are alleged in the trial amendment which under the law would entitle appellee to recover exemplary damages. [Telegraph Co. v. Brown, 58 Tex. 170; Hays v. Railway Co., 46 Tex. 272; Daniel v. Telegraph Co., 61 Tex. 456.] We are not prepared to say that the claim for actual damages for anxiety of mind is not maintainable. We incline to the opinion that it is, and therefore hold that the court did not err in overruling the exceptions to the original petition. Because the court erred in not sustaining the exceptions to the claim for exemplary damages, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

June 4, 1890.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Willson 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-union-telegraph-co-v-goodsey-texapp-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack