Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Forest
This text of 177 S.W. 204 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Forest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee sued appellant for damages by reason of the negligent failure of the appellant to deliver promptly the following telegram:
“Groveton, Texas, 5/18/09.
“Walter Forest, Milvid, Texas — Baby is a good deal worse. Do not except he will live through the night. Forby Forest.”
We have carefully considered all assignments of error, and find them without merit, except the one which complains that the verdict and judgment are excessive, being for the sum of $1,995, the full amount claimed. The trial court required a remittitur of $745, which was entered, so that the judgment of the court finally was for the sum of $1,250. A careful scrutiny of all the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the amount awarded appellee is excessive, and could only have resulted from prejudice or passion on part of the jury, and that the judgment is yet too large.
Therefore, if within 20 days from this date appellee shall file a further remittitur in the sum .of $250, the judgment will be affirmed for the sum of $1,000; otherwise the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 S.W. 204, 1915 Tex. App. LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-union-telegraph-co-v-forest-texapp-1915.