Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Catchpole
This text of 1 White & W. 108 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Catchpole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 268. Right of company to limit its liability with, regard to unrepeated messages, The blank message which was filled up by H. in the dispatch sent to 0., contained a printed contract, one of the stipulations of which was, “and the company will not hold itself liable for errors or delays in transmission or delivery of unrepeated messages. This message is an unrepeated message, and is delivered by request of the sender under the conditions named above.” In transmitting the dispatch, an error was committed in stating the amount offered by H. to C. to be $20 instead of “$12 for the season.” Held, that the case is similar, in its essential features, to the case of The Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Neill, 57 Tex. 283, and the principles of law therein enunciated are decisive of this case.
The message being unrepeated, then, under the contract and the law, the company would not be liable for an error in the transmission, unless in connection with, the error it is further shown that there was misconduct, fraud or want of due care on the part of the company, its agents or servants.
Beversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 White & W. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-union-telegraph-co-v-catchpole-texapp-1882.