Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Albertville Canning Co.
52 So. 885, 167 Ala. 342, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 483
Opinion
The special plea was defective in substance (Western U. Tel. Co. v. Merrill, 144 Ala. 616, 39 South. 121, 113 Am. St. Rep. 66; Park v. Western U. Tel. Co., 167 Ala. 339, 52 South. 884); but its legal sufficiency was not questioned. Issue was taken upon it. It was proved without contradiction, and the defend[344]*344ant should have had the general affirmative charge as requested.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Albertville Canning Co., 52 So. 885, 167 Ala. 342, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 483 (Ala. 1910).
52 So. 885 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Albertville Canning Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hawie v. Kelly
53 So. 2d 609 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)