Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Albertville Canning Co.

52 So. 885, 167 Ala. 342, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 483
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 9, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 So. 885 (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Albertville Canning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Albertville Canning Co., 52 So. 885, 167 Ala. 342, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 483 (Ala. 1910).

Opinion

SAYRE, J.

The special plea was defective in substance (Western U. Tel. Co. v. Merrill, 144 Ala. 616, 39 South. 121, 113 Am. St. Rep. 66; Park v. Western U. Tel. Co., 167 Ala. 339, 52 South. 884); but its legal sufficiency was not questioned. Issue was taken upon it. It was proved without contradiction, and the defend[344]*344ant should have had the general affirmative charge as requested.

Reversed and remanded.

Simpson, Anderson, and Mayfield, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawie v. Kelly
53 So. 2d 609 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 So. 885, 167 Ala. 342, 1910 Ala. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-union-telegraph-co-v-albertville-canning-co-ala-1910.