Western Union Tel. Co. v. Dunfield

11 Colo. 335
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedApril 15, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Colo. 335 (Western Union Tel. Co. v. Dunfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Dunfield, 11 Colo. 335 (Colo. 1888).

Opinion

Stallcup, C.

Under the facts of this case the provision of the contract requiring any claim for damages to be presented in writing within thirty days was a reasonable provision, and a failure to comply therewith constituted a waiver of such claim and thereby an extinguishment of the right of recovery thereon. Heimann v. Telegraph Co. 57 Wis. 562; Telegraph Co. v. Jones, 95 Ind. 228; Cole v. Telegraph Co. 33 Minn. 227; Telegraph Co. v. Rains, 63 Tex. 27. The judgment should be reversed.

Rising and De France, CC., concur.

Per Curiam.

For the reasons assigned in the foregoing opinion the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Beversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ryan v. Colorado Postal Telegraph Cable Co.
195 P. 645 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Colo. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-union-tel-co-v-dunfield-colo-1888.