Western Transit Co. v. The Nettie Woodward

E.D. Michigan

Western Transit Co. v. The Nettie Woodward

50 F. 224, 1892 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan

DecidedApril 30, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 F. 224 (Western Transit Co. v. The Nettie Woodward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Western Transit Co. v. The Nettie Woodward, 50 F. 224, 1892 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155 (E.D. Mich. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Swan, District Judge.

The authorities upon the subject have been so ably and exhaustively reviewed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Blatck-ford in The John G. Stevens and R. S. Carter, 40 Fed. Rep. 381, and later in that of Judge Jenkins in the court of appeals for the seventh circuit in the case of The F. H. Stanwood, 49 Fed. Rep. 577, that nothing remains to be said upon it. With their reasoning and conclusions I fully concur. In accordance therewith, the order upon these petitions will be that the decree of the Western Transit Company for damages suffered by the collision be first paid out of the fund in the registry before payment of the decrees in favor of the interveners. The costs taxed in favor of the original libelant are secured by the stipulation filed, and are recoverable from the stipulators, and for these execution will issue if necessary. In view of the nationality of the crew and the vessel, the rule applied works no injustice, since it gives the seamen’s claims the same relative rank, as against that for the collision, as is accorded by the settled principles of the English admiralty courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Swan, District Judge.

The authorities upon the subject have been so ably and exhaustively reviewed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Blatck-ford in The John G. Stevens and R. S. Carter, 40 Fed. Rep. 381, and later in that of Judge Jenkins in the court of appeals for the seventh circuit in the case of The F. H. Stanwood, 49 Fed. Rep. 577, that nothing remains to be said upon it. With their reasoning and conclusions I fully concur. In accordance therewith, the order upon these petitions will be that the decree of the Western Transit Company for damages suffered by the collision be first paid out of the fund in the registry before payment of the decrees in favor of the interveners. The costs taxed in favor of the original libelant are secured by the stipulation filed, and are recoverable from the stipulators, and for these execution will issue if necessary. In view of the nationality of the crew and the vessel, the rule applied works no injustice, since it gives the seamen’s claims the same relative rank, as against that for the collision, as is accorded by the settled principles of the English admiralty courts.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 F. 224, 1892 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-transit-co-v-the-nettie-woodward-mied-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack