Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Newport Land Co.

87 S.W. 432, 75 Ark. 286, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 584
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 6, 1905·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Wood, J.,

(after stating the facts.) Even if we concede that the complaint shows an equitable title and right to possession, still the demurrer should have been sustained. This case is ruled by Myers v. Hawkins, 67 Ark. 413. The complaint does not show that the mischief sought to be enjoined would be remediless at law. The insolvency of the defendant is not alleged. There is no allegation that there will be continuing trespasses, making necessary a multiplicity of suits to redress the injury at law. No facts are alleged showing that there will be irreparable injury to the freehold. Carney v. Hadley, 22 L. R. A. 233, and notes. .

Reversed and remanded, with directions to sustain the demurrer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Newport Land Co., 87 S.W. 432, 75 Ark. 286, 1905 Ark. LEXIS 584 (Ark. 1905).

87 S.W. 432 (Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Newport Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miracle v. Jacoby
192 F. Supp. 907 (W.D. Arkansas, 1961)
Sanders v. Boone
242 S.W. 66 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1922)
DuFresne v. Paul
221 S.W. 485 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1920)
Davis v. Davis
124 S.W. 525 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
Burnside v. Union Sawmill Co.
122 S.W. 98 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)
McCarty v. Wilson
98 S.W. 682 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1906)
Hall v. Wellman Lumber Co.
94 S.W. 43 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1906)